Viterra can’t shield identity of maltsters that engaged in dodgy business practices
Agriculture 2019-03-27 2:01 pm By Cat Fredenburgh | Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

The judge overseeing the lengthy trial between agricultural giants Cargill and Viterra over the $420 million sale of malt producer Joe White has shot down Viterra’s request to shield the identity of malting companies that allegedly engaged in shady business practices, including using a banned substance to produce malt.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au