In The News
Test post after maintenance
Construction Test 7
Construction Test 6
Construction Test 5
Construction test article 2
Test – Racing Victoria planned agreement to ‘seriously breach’ competition laws, court hears
Construction test article 1
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds

A former Norton Rose Fulbright partner has won a long-running case over his termination, with a judge ruling the law firm had intentionally misled the lawyer and must pay him $160,000 for its deception.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Want to test drive Lawyerly? Contact us to take a free trial.
Related articles
Ex-Norton Rose partner asks judge to recuse himself from spat with firm
Employment 2018-11-05 11:15 pm By Christine Caulfield
Ex-Norton Rose partner can’t block King & Wood Mallesons from acting for former firm
Appeals 2020-01-07 11:15 pm By Cat Fredenburgh
Third judge in Norton Rose ex-partner dispute refuses to step down amid accusations of ‘absurdly obtuse’ bias
Bernice Ng 2019-08-29 11:15 pm By Amelia Birnie
Ex-Norton Rose partner wins six-month delay of ‘ludicrous’ trial start date
Bernice Ng 2019-09-04 11:15 pm By Amelia Birnie
Norton Rose admits backdating signature on filing, says court OK’d it
Business of Law 2017-11-08 11:15 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au