In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says

The judge overseeing a settled class action against Murray Goulburn, which earned millions of dollars for the same legal team accused of serious misconduct in the running of the Banksia class action, invited the parties last month to reopen the case, concerned he had been misled when approving the lawyers’ costs.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Mark Elliott was Banksia class action lawyer’s ‘puppet master’, court told
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-29 11:56 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Top silk abandons defence, expresses ‘very deep regret’ over conduct in Banksia class action
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-03 11:56 pm By Miklos Bolza
Silk Norman O’Bryan likely to face further scrutiny after admissions in Banksia class action
Analysis 2020-08-06 11:56 pm By Christine Caulfield
Mark Elliott’s firm has fees cut by ’embarrassing’ $2M as Murray Goulburn settlement approved
Agriculture 2020-04-07 11:56 pm By Miklos Bolza
Judge questions whether Banksia class action lawyers should be struck off roll
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-30 11:56 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Judge drags Mark Elliott’s son, costs consultant into Banksia class action fee scandal
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-19 11:56 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au