In The News
ConstructionPRO Test 1
ConstructionPRO Test 2
ConstructionPRO Test 3
ConstructionPRO Test 4
ConstructionPRO Test 5
ConstructionPRO Test 6
ConstructionPRO Test 7
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
‘Most regrettable’: Mawhinney’s incompetence claims against lawyers don’t come close, judges say
Aaron Weinstock 2022-09-15 1:52 pmBy Sam Matthews | Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

Despite scoring a win Thursday in his appeals court battle with ASIC, Mayfair 101’s James Mawhinney was criticized for his “spurious” claims against solicitors and counsel acting for him.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au