The security sum sought by Monster Energy from an inventor suing the beverage giant for patent infringement was “manifestly excessive”, a judge has said, and was based on an estimate of costs that included the fees of three solicitors and two barristers at an interlocutory hearing.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Want to test drive Lawyerly? Contact us to take a free trial.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au