In The News
ConstructionPRO Test 1
ConstructionPRO Test 2
ConstructionPRO Test 3
ConstructionPRO Test 4
ConstructionPRO Test 5
ConstructionPRO Test 6
ConstructionPRO Test 7
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Mayfair 101 appeals $30M judgment in ASIC’s misleading advertising case
ASIC 2022-01-24 10:45 pmBy Christine Caulfield | Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

Embattled investment group Mayfair 101 is challenging a judge’s decision last month to slug it with a $30 million penalty for engaging in misleading and deceptive advertising.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au