Judge says Nine’s ‘pride or ego’ only reason for alleged defamatory articles staying online

Banki Haddock Fiora 2021-08-25 6:10 pm By Cindy Cameronne | Sydney

Please login to bookmark

A judge overseeing a Papua New Guinean politician’s defamation lawsuit has criticised Nine’s refusal to take down two allegedly defamatory articles ahead of a delayed trial, saying there was no reason to keep them online except for the publisher’s “pride or ego”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au