In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says

The judge who dismissed the ACCC’s challenge to Pacific National’s acquisition of Aurizon’s Acacia Ridge Terminal in Queensland had no power to accept an undertaking by the rail operator as an answer to the competition regulator’s case, an appeals court has been told.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
ACCC appeals loss in case over Pacific National, Aurizon terminal deal
Ashurst 2019-06-27 4:30 pm By Christine Caulfield
ACCC too late to alter Pacific National undertaking, judge says
Article 2019-06-12 4:30 pm By Cat Fredenburgh
Pacific National’s undertaking better for rail competition, says judge in tossing ACCC case
Ashurst 2019-05-16 4:30 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au