In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says

The son of controversial funder and lawyer Mark Elliott has been joined to proceedings alleging the lawyers behind the Banksia Securities class action conspired to pocket excessive fees in the case, after a court heard there was a “litany” of evidence he was party to the alleged fraudulent scheme.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Banksia class action was ‘party like no other’ for Mark Elliott and barristers, court told
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-28 5:15 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Barrister ‘deeply regrets’ class action fee scandal, says he should be struck off roll
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-13 5:15 pm By Christine Caulfield
Top silk abandons defence, expresses ‘very deep regret’ over conduct in Banksia class action
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-03 5:15 pm By Miklos Bolza
Top silk ‘joked’ with class action lawyer Mark Elliott about misleading fee expert, court told
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-05-05 5:15 pm By Christine Caulfield
Silk Norman O’Bryan, Mark Elliott’s son targeted in bid to recoup $7M legal bill
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-17 5:15 pm By Christine Caulfield
Mark Elliott was Banksia class action lawyer’s ‘puppet master’, court told
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-29 5:15 pm By Alison Eveleigh

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au