In The News
ConstructionPRO Test 1
ConstructionPRO Test 2
ConstructionPRO Test 3
ConstructionPRO Test 4
ConstructionPRO Test 5
ConstructionPRO Test 6
ConstructionPRO Test 7
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
High Court won’t review $280,000 defamation award to lawyer branded ‘Centrelink cheat’
Defamation 2020-10-15 3:03 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

The High Court has declined to review $280,000 in damages awarded to a lawyer, after an appeals court found a Today Tonight segment labelling her a “Centrelink cheat” was defamatory.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au