FreezeFrame launches infringement action over RevitalEyes knock-offs – Lawyerly

Skip to content

Practice Areas
Industries
Series & Rankings
Business of Law
Expert Insights
People In The News
About Lawyerly
Contact Us

Subscribe
Login
My account
- Saved for later

Advanced Search

In The News

ConstructionPRO Test 1

ConstructionPRO Test 2

ConstructionPRO Test 3

ConstructionPRO Test 4

ConstructionPRO Test 5

ConstructionPRO Test 6

ConstructionPRO Test 7

High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case

I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited

Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds

FreezeFrame launches infringement action over RevitalEyes knock-offs

Gilbert + Tobin 2019-10-30 10:17 pmBy Christine Caulfield | Melbourne

TOP NEWS IN YOUR INBOX

Get the legal news headlines that matter in a daily email.

Most Read

Mills Oakley did not provide ‘accurate’ costs estimate in share dispute, court finds
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds

Categories

Law Firms
- Gilbert + Tobin
- Thomson Geer
Practice Areas
- Intellectual Property
Judges
- Judge Julia Baird

Tags

Please login to bookmarkClose

Username or Email Address

Password

Remember Me

The cosmetics company behind the beauty range FreezeFrame has filed proceedings against a group of companies allegedly selling counterfeit versions of its popular products, which include the top-selling RevitalEyes.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Username or Email Address

Password

Remember Me

Lost your password?

Previous Article

Lawyerly is the leading source of legal news for commercial lawyers in Australia.

To contact Lawyerly about a group subscription, email subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au.

About Us
Contact Us
Copyright Notice
FAQs
Privacy Policy
Subscribe
Terms and Conditions

Follow us on:

©2025 Lawyerly Media Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au