In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says

Pizza chain Domino’s has been blasted for redactions in documents it has produced in a class action over worker pay, with a judge warning the franchisor that it could not act as “judge and jury” in deciding what information could be given to the applicant.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Domino’s attacks class action, says franchisee representations were opinion not fact
Class Actions 2019-12-03 10:02 pm By Cat Fredenburgh
Domino’s Pizza wants class action claims struck out, but judge not biting yet
Class Actions 2019-08-22 10:02 pm By Christine Caulfield
Domino’s can’t block funder from viewing unredacted docs in class action
Class Actions 2019-11-05 10:02 pm By Miklos Bolza
Domino’s slammed by judge for ‘ridiculous’ redactions in class action docs
Class Actions 2019-12-06 10:02 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au