Court may scrap expanded class definition in Ethicon pelvic mesh case as judgment looms
Andrew Naylor 2019-10-30 10:52 pm By Miklos Bolza | Sydney
Please login to bookmark Close

An impending judgment in the long-running class action against Johnson & Johnson unit Ethicon over allegedly defective pelvic mesh implants has sent the parties scrambling about opt out notices and the Federal Court considering reversing prior orders that expanded the group definition.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au