In The News
ConstructionPRO Test 1
ConstructionPRO Test 2
ConstructionPRO Test 3
ConstructionPRO Test 4
ConstructionPRO Test 5
ConstructionPRO Test 6
ConstructionPRO Test 7
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Client poaching allegations fly in Monsanto class actions
Agriculture 2020-05-22 3:19 pmBy Miklos Bolza | Sydney
Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has rejected concerns about client poaching raised by the law firms involved in competing class actions against chemical giant Monsanto.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au