Clayton Utz instructions from AMP irrelevant, legal experts say

Class Actions 2018-04-26 4:40 pm By Christine Caulfield | Melbourne

Please login to bookmark

Clayton Utz’s public statements referencing its terms of engagement with AMP in drafting an independent report are irrelevant if it knew the document was destined for the corporate regulator, legal experts say, and transcripts from the Royal Commission suggest the law firm did know.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Under fire, Clayton Utz denies AMP report was compromised

Article 2018-04-23 4:40 pm By Christine Caulfield

AMP chief quits amid scandal, board hires King & Wood Mallesons

Article 2018-04-20 4:40 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Independence of Clayton Utz report questioned at Royal Commission

Clayton Utz 2018-04-17 4:40 pm By Christine Caulfield

Clayton Utz instructions from AMP irrelevant, legal experts say

Class Actions 2018-04-26 4:40 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au