A judge has found the lead applicant in a class action over an allegedly defective crop sprayer did not suffer any loss despite finding agricultural equipment manufacturer Hardi misled him and other farmers who bought the machine. 

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Want to test drive Lawyerly? Contact us to take a free trial.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au