Most Recent
Geowash misled franchisees about car wash costs, court finds
Competition & Consumer Protection 2019-02-11 4:44 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

Car wash franchisor Geowash misled franchisees about how much revenue they could expect to earn per month and acted unconscionably in its charging practices, the court has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

AFT not ready to take its medicine for ‘misleading’ Maxigesic ads
Appeals 2019-02-08 10:54 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

AFT Pharmaceuticals has launched a partial challenge to a court ruling that its Maxigesic ads made a number of misleading claims, including that the drug provides stronger and more effective relief than Reckitt Benckiser’s Nuromol.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Court overturns $2.8M Microsoft IP judgment against computer retailer
Competition & Consumer Protection 2019-02-07 10:35 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

A Melbourne computer retailer has won its appeal of a $2.8 million damages award for allegedly violating Microsoft’s Windows 7 IP, with a judge overturning the ruling by Justice Alexander ‘Sandy’ Street and ordering a rehearing before a new judge.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Food franchisors to face ACCC scrutiny
Competition & Consumer Protection 2019-02-07 7:36 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

Café, restaurant and take away food services franchisors, which have faced criticism and litigation for allegedly misleading franchisees, will now face heightened scrutiny from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Optus hit with $10M fine for misleading customers over mobile phone bills
Article 2019-02-06 2:38 pm By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

Optus has been ordered to pay $10 million in penalties for billing unwitting customers for premium mobile phone services, the consumer regulator said Wednesday.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Federal Court to get white collar crime caseload
Competition & Consumer Protection 2019-02-05 10:40 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

The government has thrown its support behind a proposal to give the Federal Court jurisdiction to hear white collar criminal matters.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

BlueScope wins confidentiality order in Aurizon collusion case
Ashurst 2019-02-05 3:38 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

The court overseeing the ACCC’s collusion case against rail freight operators Aurizon and Pacific National has granted a confidentiality request by BlueScope Steel over documents subpoenaed after the steel company told the court trucks were not a viable alternative for transporting its goods in Queensland.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Pitcher Partners appeals $5.6M damages award over concealed accounting error
Alastair Vincent 2019-02-05 2:16 pm By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

Accounting firm Pitcher Partners will challenge a ruling that it owes a NSW bus operator $5.6 million in damages for fraudulently concealing a costly amortisation error.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ASIC bans Commonwealth Bank from charging ongoing service fee
Competition & Consumer Protection 2019-02-04 1:46 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has ordered Commonwealth Bank to immediately stop charging customers service fees, after the bank violated the terms of an enforceable undertaking related to its fees for no service conduct.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Barristers suing DLA Piper over $370,000 in fees did not do all the work, court told
Business of Law 2019-02-04 11:21 am By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

Two barristers suing DLA Piper over $370,000 in fees did not perform all the work for which they billed the law firm, a court heard Monday.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?