Most Recent
Funder wants $13.2M commission from confidential Opal Tower class action settlement
Alexander Barnett 2022-07-20 1:06 pm By Christine Caulfield

Although the settlement sum has not been disclosed, court documents in the Opal Tower class action reveal the litigation funder backing the case will seek $13.2 million in commission when the parties appear before the court later this year.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Booktopia agrees on penalty in ACCC case over ‘misleading’ refund policy
ACCC 2022-07-15 1:43 pm By Christine Caulfield

Booktopia has resolved a case by the consumer regulator alleging the online book retailer’s policy that required customers to request a refund within two business days of purchase was misleading.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Norton Rose Fulbright loses another energy, projects bigwig
Ashurst 2022-07-11 11:04 am By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

Norton Rose Fulbright has lost the co-head of its energy, infrastructure and resources team in Australia to King & Wood Mallesons, just months after the group’s other leader jumped ship to another Big Six firm.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Ex-Norton Rose manager appeals loss in bullying case
Appeals 2022-07-08 11:05 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

A former Norton Rose Fulbright digital marketing manager is trying to revive her allegations that the firm fired her after she complained of bullying and sex discrimination by her supervisor.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

William Inglis & Son waived privilege over Norton Rose Fulbright emails in land spat
Andre Zahra 2022-06-28 4:54 pm By Sam Matthews Sydney

Australia’s oldest thoroughbred auctioneer William Inglis & Son waived legal professional privilege over advice from its solicitor Norton Rose Fulbright over contamination of land it bought in 2009, a judge has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Hutchinson’s ‘monstrous’ claim survives in case over $153M Port Melbourne development
Construction 2022-06-22 10:00 pm By Cindy Cameronne Sydney

Construction giant Hutchinson has succeeded in bringing claims against a related entity of a Port Melbourne property developer over a $153 million project after alleging the developer was a “company of straw” that had no assets.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

7-Eleven class action funder wins first-ever interim payment from settlement
7-Eleven 2022-06-17 4:24 pm By Cindy Cameronne Sydney

A judge has granted a litigation funder for two franchisee class actions against 7-Eleven an interim payment to cover its costs ahead of a ruling on how much it can pocket from a $98 million settlement.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘Unsatisfactory state of affairs’: 7-Eleven class action funder wants $16.6M advance on payout
7-Eleven 2022-06-15 4:49 pm By Cindy Cameronne Sydney

A litigation funder for two franchisee class actions against 7-Eleven has asked a court for a $16.6 million payout to cover its costs before a judge rules on how much it can pocket from a $98 million settlement.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Norton Rose Fulbright prevails in bullying case by ex-marketing manager
Employment 2022-06-09 10:35 pm By Christine Caulfield

Law firm Norton Rose Fulbright has won the dismissal of a case brought by a former digital marketing manager who claims she was fired two months after making an internal complaint of bullying and sex discrimination by her supervisor.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Ex-Dick Smith CEO should be liable for approving $28.5M in dividends, appeals court told
Alice Zheng 2022-05-30 9:30 pm By Cindy Cameronne Sydney

The former CEO of failed electronics retailer Dick Smith should be held responsible for approving two dividend payments worth $28.5 million which the company could not afford to pay given it owed millions in unpaid bank loans and supplier debts, an appeals court has heard. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?