Most Recent
Sparke Helmore wins reversal of $285,000 negligence judgment
Appeals 2023-02-22 4:30 pm By Sam Matthews

An appeals court has thrown out a $285,000 negligence judgment against Sparke Helmore over two sales contracts worth $1.5 million and rejected a NSW developer’s attempts to squeeze the law firm for a heftier damages bill.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Sparke Helmore had paralegal ‘at the helm’ of botched land sale, court told
Andre Zahra 2022-06-21 10:08 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Law firm Sparke Helmore negligently failed to alert a NSW developer to an imminent deadline for two land sale contracts in a troubled $30 million development because a paralegal, rather than a solicitor, was “at the helm”, an appeals court has heard.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Sparke Helmore should face higher damages bill for negligence, developer says
Andre Zahra 2022-05-06 4:51 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

A NSW developer says law firm Sparke Helmore should face a heftier damages bill for its negligence in failing to alert it to an imminent deadline in two land sale contracts worth a combined $1.5 million that were part of a troubled $30 million development.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Sparke Helmore ordered to pay $285K in negligence lawsuit
Andre Zahra 2021-12-09 6:55 pm By Bianca Hrovat

Sparke Helmore will have to pay $285,598 in damages for its negligence in advising a New South Wales property developer, but a judge found the law firm should not be on the hook for costs because the lawsuit was filed in the wrong court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Sparke Helmore’s security demand in $1M negligence case ‘excessive’, court told
Business of Law 2021-09-28 4:45 pm By Miklos Bolza

A property developer suing law firm Sparke Helmore in a $1 million negligence suit has resisted a bid for $215,000 in security for costs made weeks ahead of a four-day hearing in the matter, calling the sum “excessive”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?