Most Recent
The class action settlements that came under fire in 2021
Adero Law 2022-01-12 6:04 pm By Christine Caulfield

If evidence were needed that courts are not rubber stamping class action settlements, the scrutiny of multi-million dollar agreements in 2021 is proof positive that judicial oversight of representative proceedings is robust.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘Troubled’ judge won’t sign off on Woolworths class action settlement
Adero Law 2021-12-15 5:39 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Saying it will only benefit the law firm and lead applicants, a judge has refused to approve a settlement in an underpayments class action against supermarket giant Woolworths, which would see no payout to employees.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

UniLodge targeted in underpayments class action investigation
Adero Law 2021-12-13 7:35 pm By Christine Caulfield

Unilodge Australia faces a potential class action alleging the student housing agency shortchanged staff by paying them under the wrong award.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Romeo’s to pay $1.55M to employees in class action settlement
Adero Law 2021-12-06 11:47 am By Christine Caulfield

Romeo’s will pay $1.55 million to registered group members as part of a settlement of two class actions alleging the supermarket chain underpaid staff.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

More casuals class actions to be dropped in wake of High Court’s Rossato decision
Adam Hochroth 2021-12-01 3:35 pm By Miklos Bolza

Two law firms are seeking court approval to drop class actions brought on behalf of allegedly misclassified casual coal miners, in light of a High Court decision that “radically” decreased their chances of success.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

In class action defence, Merivale says it shouldn’t be forced to backpay staff
Adero Law 2021-11-24 3:10 pm By Miklos Bolza

Hospitality giant Merivale has streamlined its defence of a $129 million underpayment class action, arguing that it shouldn’t be expected to back pay employees because it operated its business under the mistaken belief that its enterprise agreement governing staff at 70 of its venues was valid.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Romeo’s settles two underpayments class actions
Adero Law 2021-11-23 1:26 pm By Christine Caulfield

Supermarket chain Romeo’s has reached a settlement in two class actions alleging staff were underpaid, but details of the agreements are scant.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Law firm seeks to drop two class actions on behalf of coal mine casuals
Adero Law 2021-11-19 5:49 pm By Miklos Bolza

A law firm that has filed seven class actions on behalf of casual coal mine workers is looking to discontinue two of those cases, after the High Court dealt them a serious blow by finding that those who work regular shifts are not entitled to paid leave and other entitlements under the Fair Work Act.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Woolworths class action settlement to cover $1.75M legal bill, but no payout for group members
Adero Law 2021-11-12 11:06 am By Miklos Bolza

Woolworths has agreed to pay $1.75 million in Adero Law’s legal costs as part of a settlement of an underpayments class action which will see group members recoup any amounts they are owed in a separate proceeding brought by the Fair Work Ombudsman rather than the class action.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Canberra property developer faces class action investigation for rescinding off-the-plan contracts
Adero Law 2021-10-22 3:20 pm By Miklos Bolza

A Canberra-based property developer may be hit with a class action for allegedly engaging in misleading and deceptive practices which caused financial losses to property buyers, including by rescinding or cancelling off-the-plan contracts in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?