Most Recent
Firstmac slams Zip Pay provider’s defences in fight over ‘Zip’ trade mark
Financial Services 2022-03-08 11:30 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

Buy now, pay later giant Zip Co cannot rely on its infringing use of the ‘Zip’ trade mark to defend a lawsuit by the mark’s owner Firstmac, the mortgage provider’s barrister told a judge on the first day of trial in the high-stakes intellectual property dispute.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Redbubble can’t dodge Hells Angels trade mark infringement claims
Allens 2022-03-08 6:24 pm By Miklos Bolza Sydney

Online marketplace Redbubble cannot rely on the terms of a settlement with the US chapter of Hells Angels to avoid trade mark infringement claims by the Australian arm of the bikie gang, a court  has ruled.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘That’s not what investors signed up for’: Linchpin used funds for unauthorised loans, court told
ASIC 2022-03-08 9:40 pm By Sam Matthews Melbourne

Clients of Linchpin Capital Group and subsidiary Endeavour Securities who were promised investments in a diversified loan portfolio were instead duped into funding Linchpin’s own business interests and lining its directors’ pockets, a judge has heard as trial got underway in ASIC’s case against three former Linchpin directors.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Energy Beverages tries to revive ‘Mother’ trade marks
Appeals 2022-03-08 3:41 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

The maker of Mother brand energy drinks has filed an appeal challenging a judge’s decision to remove two of its registered ‘Mother’ trade marks for non-use.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

HWL Ebsworth overlooked ‘obvious red flags’ in joint venture contract, trial told
Business of Law 2022-03-07 9:11 pm By Bianca Hrovat Sydney

HWL Ebsworth’s clients suffered a staggering $130 million loss when the law firm’s solicitors failed to notice “obvious red flags” in a joint venture contract for an ambitious Sydney-based land development, a court has heard.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘The end of litigation as we know it’: Judge pans Nando’s costs in franchising spat
Access Law 2022-03-07 2:36 pm By Miklos Bolza Sydney

Nando’s Australia has been criticised for claiming that its costs in a dispute against a single franchisee could reach close to $2 million, with an associate judge saying the bill could kickstart a precedent that leads to “the end of litigation as we know it”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

WA premier says death threats followed Clive Palmer’s ‘outrageous’ remarks
Barry Dean 2022-03-07 9:39 pm By Sam Matthews Melbourne

Taking the stand Monday in a defamation dispute with mining billionaire Clive Palmer, WA premier Mark McGowan said Palmer’s “hurtful and outrageous” public comments led to death threats against his wife and family.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Rio Tinto must pay $750,000 for disclosure breaches over $5.8B acquisition
ASIC 2022-03-07 10:56 am By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

Mining giant Rio Tinto has been ordered to pay a $750,000 penalty in ASIC’s case over a disclosure breach linked to its $5.8 billion purchase of a Mozambique coal mining company.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ANZ denies charging retrospective interest on credit cards
ANZ 2022-03-07 1:40 pm By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

ANZ has hit back at claims in a class action that it slugged retrospective interest on credit card accounts and that its interest terms were not explicit, arguing the term ‘retrospective’ is liable to “confuse” the issues to be decided by the court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

$28M settlement in Arnold Bloch Leibler class action to get court’s OK
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2022-03-04 11:05 am By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

A judge will approve a $28 million settlement resolving a class action against Arnold Bloch Leibler over advice the law firm gave to Slater & Gordon ahead of a disastrous acquisition. A 28 per cent commission for the case’s funder will also get the court’s nod.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?