Most Recent
Resort not vicariously liable for actions of urinating employee, High Court says
Appeals 2023-08-02 10:14 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The High Court has found a Whitsundays resort is not vicariously liable for the actions of an employee who urinated on his roommate in staff accommodation after a night of drinking, finding the act had “no real connection” to his employment.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Hotel’s compliance with COVID-19 orders didn’t doom $11.25M sale: High Court
Chief Justice Susan Kiefel 2023-03-08 4:53 pm By Sam Matthews

The High Court has ruled that the buyer of a well-known Sydney hotel was not entitled to repudiate the purchase agreement because of the hotel’s compliance with restrictions on public gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected the operation of the business.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ACCC loses appeal in ‘fanciful’ NSW Ports competition case
ACCC 2023-02-23 1:23 pm By Cindy Cameronne

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has lost its challenge to a decision that tossed its case alleging NSW Ports stymied competition when it signed a 50-year agreement with the state to privatise two ports. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court guts peak indebtedness rule in loss for Gunns creditor
Appeals 2023-02-08 4:23 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Liquidators for collapsed forestry giant Gunns Plantations have lost a High Court appeal over $1.2 million in payments to a former supplier that confirmed the so-called peak indebtedness rule does not apply in Australian insolvency law.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

An ‘odd’ result: High Court told reputation can’t be ignored in Botox TM case
Angus Lang 2022-12-08 4:30 pm By Cindy Cameronne

A contradictor has argued that the High Court must consider the reputation of Botox maker Allergan’s trade marks in a cosmetic company’s challenge to a judgment finding it infringed the marks by marketing its topical creams as Botox alternatives.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court to weigh in on penalties for foreign bribery violations
Appeals 2022-11-17 11:49 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The High Court has agreed to hear prosecutors’ appeal of a “manifestly inadequate” $1.35 million penalty against an engineering firm for bribing foreign officials in Vietnam to secure $10 million in infrastructure contracts.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court rejects Worley’s plea to weigh in on disclosure test in shareholder class actions
Alexander Edwards 2022-10-21 11:32 pm By Christine Caulfield

In a boost to shareholder class actions, the High Court has dismissed an application by engineering services firm Worley to appeal a finding that companies should disclose to the market forecasts that ought reasonably to have been held.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Mayfair’s James Mawhinney wants High Court to shut down ASIC case
Appeals 2022-10-12 9:43 pm By Sam Matthews

The founder of beleaguered investment group Mayfair 101, James Mawhinney, has asked the High Court to overturn his own successful Full Court appeal of a decision that saw him banned from soliciting funds or promoting any financial product for 20 years.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Mayfair 101 loses appeal of $30M penalty in ASIC’s misleading conduct case
ASIC 2022-10-10 12:08 pm By Christine Caulfield

In a win for the corporate regulator, an appeals court has rejected investment group Mayfair 101’s appeal of a $30M penalty following a judge’s finding that it misled investors about the level of risk of its financial products.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Full Court upholds validity of Pfizer’s Dynastat patent
Adrian Ryan 2022-09-30 4:58 pm By Cindy Cameronne

A judge has thrown out competing appeals of a decision finding Pfizer’s patent for its post-operative injectable painkiller Dynastat is valid and that Australian drug maker Juno Pharmaceuticals infringed the patent by selling generic versions of the drug in Australia.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?