Most Recent
ACCC takes aim at social media influencers
ACCC 2023-01-27 1:50 pm By Sam Matthews

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has begun a sweep of social media sweep over concerns about “manipulative marketing techniques” employed by influencers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Tolga Kumova wins $275,000 defamation judgment against Stock Swami
Barry Dean 2023-01-09 11:41 pm By Sam Matthews

The man behind the Twitter handle Stock Swami has been ordered to pay $275,000 in damages to Tolga Kumova, after a judge found his tweets defamed the mining investor by accusing him of insider trading, misleading the market, and running a pump and dump scheme.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

In Stock Swami decision, judge sends own concerns notice to defamation lawyers
Defamation 2023-01-09 11:08 pm By Christine Caulfield

Lawyers for respondents in defamation litigation have been put on notice for their practice of tossing defences around like grenades in armed combat — it isn’t going to fly any more, warns a judge whose docket is stacked with high profile cases.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘ASX Wolf’ trader’s Instagram account was unlicensed financial services biz, court rules
ASIC 2022-12-20 4:51 pm By Sam Matthews

Gold Coast ‘finfluencer’ Tyson Scholz provided illegal financial services by giving tips on his Instagram account and to customers who paid for access to his seminars and ‘Black Wolf Pit’ chat room, a judge has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Facebook flags potential conflict of interest in cryptocurrency ad class action
Class Actions 2022-10-25 2:45 pm By Sam Matthews

Facebook owner Meta wants to uncover the basis on which crypto tokens have been issued to bankroll a class action over its 2018 ban on cryptocurrency ads, citing the potentially conflicted interests of the self-represented lead applicant.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Facebook page admin hit with $205,000 judgment for defamatory comments
Construction 2022-10-05 3:29 pm By Cindy Cameronne

A judge has ordered a Victoria local councillor to pay a developer $205,000 in damages after finding he was responsible for comments on a community Facebook page he ran that alleged the developer was corrupt.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Peter Dutton drops High Court appeal over ‘rape apologist’ tweet
Appeals 2022-09-27 1:00 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Opposition leader Peter Dutton has dropped a High Court appeal seeking to overturn a Full Court judgment that found a tweet by refugee activist Shane Bazzi labeling him a “rape apologist” was not defamatory.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Daily Mail appeals $150,000 Erin Molan defamation judgment
Appeals 2022-09-14 11:48 pm By Sam Matthews

The Daily Mail is appealing a judge’s decision to award Nine sports presenter Erin Molan $150,000 over an article concerning an on-air remark she made about the pronunciation of National Rugby League Polynesian player names.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Sports presenter Erin Molan wins $150,000 defamation judgment against Daily Mail
Bruce McClintock 2022-08-30 11:27 am By Sam Matthews

Nine sports presenter Erin Molan has won a substantial payout from the Daily Mail over an article concerning an on-air remark she made about the pronunciation of National Rugby League Polynesian player names, despite failing to prove the story painted her as a racist.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Peter Dutton wants to grill lawyer on possible ‘sham bills’ in defamation spat
Appeals 2022-08-12 11:36 am By Sam Matthews

Opposition leader Peter Dutton has questioned a costs agreement between refugee activist Shane Bazzi and his solicitors in a defamation dispute, raising the possibility that “sham bills” may have been provided to the court to assess the costs to which Bazzi is entitled for his successful appeal.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?