Most Recent
Drakes settles underpayments class action for $2.2M
Adero Law 2022-04-11 9:34 pm By Miklos Bolza

A class action on behalf of Drakes store managers claimed to be worth up to $20 million has settled for $2.2 million, and the law firm behind the proceedings wants a cut of up to $837,000.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Treasury Wine Estates’ ‘fishing’ claim against class action firms falls flat
Alistair Pound 2022-04-05 4:45 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Law firms accused of “fishing for a case” in a consolidated shareholder class action against Treasury Wine Estates have won access to key financial information in reports to the company’s board, with a registrar finding the material was relevant to the case.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Law firms accused of ‘fishing’ to expand class action against Treasury Wine Estates
Alistair Pound 2022-04-04 4:09 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Maurice Blackburn and Slater & Gordon are “fishing for a case” against Treasury Wine Estates, a court has heard during a discovery fight in a consolidated shareholder class action against the Penfolds wine maker.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Full Court ruling on MIS regime may not resolve funding issues in RFG class action, court hears
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2022-04-01 4:54 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

A case before the Full Court that will revisit the question of whether class actions are managed investment schemes may not resolve all of the funding controversies that have emerged in a class action against franchise giant Retail Food Group, a court has heard.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

KPMG liquidators can’t dodge examination over handling of Jewel of India sale
Banton Group 2022-03-31 5:38 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Liquidators for ready-made meals producer Jewel of India have lost their bid to dodge public examination over their alleged poor handling of the business’ sale and failure to investigate potential claims against the Commonwealth Bank.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ATO hits back at Pepsico lawsuit over Schweppes bottling payments
ATO 2022-03-25 9:31 pm By Miklos Bolza

A notice issued to Pepsico demanding royalty withholding tax over bottling payments made by Schweppes correctly notified the soft drink giant of its tax liability, the Australian Taxation Office has said.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Peters served with $12M penalty for exclusive dealing
ACCC 2022-03-25 1:51 pm By Sam Matthews

Peters Ice Cream has been hit with a $12 million penalty after admitting to entering an anti-competitive exclusive agreement for distribution of its single serve ice creams to service stations and convenience stores across Australia.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

In-N-Out Burgers settles trade mark suit against ‘ghost kitchen’ operator
Baker McKenzie 2022-03-18 9:58 pm By Miklos Bolza

American fast food chain In-N-Out Burgers has settled a trade mark dispute with a Queensland fast food business that operates “ghost kitchens” under the name In & Out Aussie Burgers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Mars keeps MM mark away from chocolate in trade mark settlement
Baker McKenzie 2022-03-14 11:08 am By Miklos Bolza

A judge has signed off on a settlement in a trade mark spat between M&M candy maker Mars and the world’s largest macadamia grower, Macquis Macadamias, under which Marquis will no longer seek to register its MM mark for chocolate bars.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Energy Beverages tries to revive ‘Mother’ trade marks
Appeals 2022-03-08 3:41 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The maker of Mother brand energy drinks has filed an appeal challenging a judge’s decision to remove two of its registered ‘Mother’ trade marks for non-use.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?