Most Recent
Citing coronavirus, judge orders limited discovery in ANZ, Westpac ‘junk’ insurance class actions
ANZ 2020-04-03 11:18 pm By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

Noting the challenge of searching for documentary evidence while employees are working from home, a judge overseeing two consumer class actions against ANZ and Westpac has directed the banks to hand over only a limited number of documents to the applicants, and given them extra time to do it.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Judge approves Bellamy’s $49.7M settlement of shareholder class actions
Class Actions 2020-03-13 11:13 am By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

A judge has given his blessing to a $49.7 million settlement of two class actions that alleged infant food maker Bellamy’s misled investors about its China growth strategy and declining market share in Australia.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Class action alleges 7-Eleven made franchisees use Metcash-owned vendor
7-Eleven 2020-02-04 6:37 pm By Cat Fredenburgh Melbourne

A class action brought against 7-Eleven claims the convenience store chain ordered franchisees to purchase goods from supplier C-Store so that 7-Eleven could meet its obligation under a contract with the Metcash-owned supplier.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Judge says High Court did not rule out common fund orders at settlement
Class Actions 2019-12-06 1:58 pm By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

The High Court’s ruling Wednesday that judges have no power to issue a common fund order in the initial phases of a class action does not bind them after a settlement has been reached, a Federal Court judge said Friday.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Funder appeals ruling over security in Fair Work class actions
Adero Law 2019-11-12 10:44 pm By Christine Caulfield Melbourne

Litigation funder Augusta Ventures has brought its promised appeal of a groundbreaking ruling that put it on the hook for paying security for costs in an employment class action over the classification of casual mine workers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?