Most Recent
Opal Tower engineer’s status as Icon subcontractor enough for class action indemnity, trial told

Opal Tower engineer WSP is battling insurers for builder Icon over coverage for the costs of a class action by residents, telling a court on Wednesday that Icon was liable for alleged structural defects in the building despite having subcontracted the structural design to WSP.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Opal Tower engineer must hand over policies, bank records in class action coverage spat

Opal Tower structural engineer WSP has been ordered to produce all professional indemnity policies covering its work on the defective building in a lawsuit against insurers for builder Icon, despite arguing for the “commercial sensitivity” of the information.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Opal Tower insurers question reasonableness of class action defence costs

Three insurers for builder Icon are planning to test the reasonableness of a structural engineer’s defence costs in a now settled class action brought by apartment owners in Sydney’s ill-fated Opal Tower.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court declines Queensland floods class action appeal

The High Court has declined special leave to a class action to challenge a ruling that found dam operator Seqwater was not liable for the 2011 Queensland floods, after the state of Queensland and subcontractor Sunwater agreed to pay $440 million last year to settle their share of the liability in the long-running case.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

WSP to target another insurer over Opal Tower class action coverage after discovering $50M policy

The structural engineer behind Sydney’s Opal Tower plans to drag insurer Tokio Marine into a lawsuit against two of Icon’s insurers, after discovering another $50 million policy that responds to claims in a class action brought by apartment owners.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Opal Tower engineer takes insurers to court over class action coverage

The structural engineer behind Sydney’s Opal Tower has taken builder Icon’s insurers to court, arguing they should cover its costs in a class action brought on behalf of residents of the ill-fated building and related litigation.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Opal Tower engineer wins bid to probe scope of insurers indemnity of Icon

The structural engineer behind Sydney’s ill-fated Opal Tower can examine whether builder Icon Co has been indemnified for $31 million worth of damage which occurred in the 36-storey apartment block on Christmas Eve of 2018, a court has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court asked to weigh in on Queensland floods class action

The applicants in the Queensland floods class action have asked the High Court to overturn a judgment which found dam operator Seqwater was not liable because it was functioning as a public authority when operating two dams during the 2011 floods, arguing the case raises important issues about appeals in ‘mega’ litigation.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘Hundreds of lawyers’ could overwhelm combustible cladding class action, court told

“Hundreds of lawyers” could overwhelm Microsoft Teams if German cladding manufacturer 3A Composites continues adding cross-claimants in a class action over highly flammable building materials, a court has heard.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Concrete company knew of prior Opal Tower failure, class action cross-claim alleges

Prefab concrete company Evolution Precast Systems failed to install reinforced concrete in Sydney’s ill-fated Opal Tower and knew about a prior failure with one of the building’s panels, engineer WSP Structures alleges in a cross-claim lobbed in a class action on behalf of residents of the tower.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?