Most Recent
Insurers challenge CIMIC win on coverage for Iraq bribery cases
Allens 2023-05-24 1:12 pm By Sam Matthews

Appeals and cross-appeals are flying over a judge’s finding that engineering services firm CIMIC Group can pursue insurance claims for costs arising from allegations it engaged in corrupt practices, including a $32 million class action settlement.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Silk for Deutsche Bank in failed ACCC case elevated to NSW Court of Appeal
Business of Law 2022-03-30 5:01 pm By Christine Caulfield

The senior counsel for Deutsche Bank in its sucessful defence against the ACCC’s landmark cartel case is one of three new judicial appointments in NSW.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘A very expensive lesson’: Ultra Tune to sue former auditors, lawyers over $2M franchising penalty
Chief Justice James Allsop 2019-09-20 11:58 am By Amelia Birnie

National car repair franchise Ultra Tune is preparing negligence suits against its former lawyers and auditors, after the company on Friday won a $590,000 reduction in a $2.6 million penalty for breaches of the Franchising Code of Conduct.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

$100 million class action trailblazer back in the ring with new case on behalf of farmers
Agriculture 2019-08-13 8:15 pm By Amelia Birnie

A trailblazing country lawyer who took out seven overdraft extensions to self-fund a landmark $100 million case in the early years of the federal class action regime has stepped back into the ring to run a new case on behalf of dozens of Australian farmers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Ultra Tune appeals ‘manifestly excessive’ penalty for breaching Franchising Code
Chief Justice James Allsop 2019-08-12 9:11 pm By Miklos Bolza

National car repair franchise Ultra Tune has argued in a Full Federal Court appeal that a $1.07 million penalty in an ACCC case was “manifestly excessive” because it was based on unintentional breaches of the Franchising Code of Conduct that were caused by tardy accountants and auditors.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?