Banksia judge made no allowance for ‘youth and inexperience’ of Mark Elliott’s son, appeal says

Andrew Palmer 2021-11-26 12:48 pm By Christine Caulfield | Melbourne

Please login to bookmark

The judge who made findings against the son of the mastermind behind the Banksia class action scam may have formed strong views about the 27-year-old’s role before he testified and used the flawed suggestion that he was his father’s right-hand man as an “evidential gap filler”, an appeals court has been told.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Banksia class action barristers declare bankruptcy after $21.7M judgment

Andrew Palmer 2021-11-19 12:48 pm By Christine Caulfield

Banksia class action funder’s son should not be punished for the sins of his father, judge told

Andrew Palmer 2021-03-16 12:48 pm By Christine Caulfield

‘Arrogant’ barristers in Banksia class action struck off roll, face criminal probe

Andrew Palmer 2021-10-11 12:48 pm By Christine Caulfield

Lawyer takes Banksia class action ruling to appeals court

Andrew Palmer 2021-11-08 12:48 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au