In The News
ConstructionPRO Test 1
ConstructionPRO Test 2
ConstructionPRO Test 3
ConstructionPRO Test 4
ConstructionPRO Test 5
ConstructionPRO Test 6
ConstructionPRO Test 7
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
‘Arrogant’ barristers in Banksia class action struck off roll, face criminal probe
Andrew Palmer 2021-10-11 5:00 pmBy Christine Caulfield | Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

Lawyers running the scandal-ridden Banksia class action have been struck from the roll of practitioners, will face criminal investigation and must pay group members $11.7 million in damages.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Day of reckoning arrives for Banksia class action lawyers
Andrew Palmer 2021-10-08 5:00 pm By Christine Caulfield
Funder of scandal-ridden Banksia class action expresses ‘remorse and regret’
Andrew Palmer 2021-03-17 5:00 pm By Christine Caulfield
‘I idolised dad’: Banksia funder’s son takes stand over class action fee scandal
Andrew Palmer 2020-12-01 5:00 pm By Christine Caulfield
Routine email destruction ‘bombshell’ on eve of Banksia funder’s death just a ruse, court told
Andrew Palmer 2020-12-08 5:00 pm By Christine Caulfield
Judge questions whether Banksia class action lawyers should be struck off roll
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-30 5:00 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Top silk abandons defence, expresses ‘very deep regret’ over conduct in Banksia class action
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-03 5:00 pm By Miklos Bolza

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au