The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has filed an appeal after a judge dismissed its case alleging the Commonwealth Bank of Australia accepted conflicted remuneration through the sale of its Essential Super product, finding it was “misconceived”.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Want to test drive Lawyerly? Contact us to take a free trial.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au