In The News
ConstructionPRO Test 1
ConstructionPRO Test 2
ConstructionPRO Test 3
ConstructionPRO Test 4
ConstructionPRO Test 5
ConstructionPRO Test 6
ConstructionPRO Test 7
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Ashley & Martin’s hair loss treatment contracts unfair, judge finds
Competition & Consumer Protection 2019-09-04 11:43 pmBy Christine Caulfield | Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

Ashley & Martin signed up 25,000 customers to its hair loss program on contracts that put them on the hook for paying for treatment they didn’t receive, a judge has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au