In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says

The judge overseeing professional misconduct claims against lawyers in the Banksia class action has denied Alex Elliott’s request to stay the case against him while he takes his recusal application to the Court of Appeal, branding the stay ‘an indulgence’.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Banksia class action was ‘party like no other’ for Mark Elliott and barristers, court told
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-28 2:31 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Silk Norman O’Bryan likely to face further scrutiny after admissions in Banksia class action
Analysis 2020-08-06 2:31 pm By Christine Caulfield
Judge questions whether Banksia class action lawyers should be struck off roll
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-30 2:31 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Top silk ‘joked’ with class action lawyer Mark Elliott about misleading fee expert, court told
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-05-05 2:31 pm By Christine Caulfield
Silk Norman O’Bryan, Mark Elliott’s son targeted in bid to recoup $7M legal bill
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-17 2:31 pm By Christine Caulfield
Judge drags Mark Elliott’s son, costs consultant into Banksia class action fee scandal
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-19 2:31 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au