In The News
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says
ACCC delays decision on Coles acquisition of Saputo plants
Hungry Jack’s to take bite out of franchisee’s profits with ‘competing’ restaurants: suit
Please login to bookmark Close

Clive Palmer has lost a fight to stay criminal proceedings alleging his company breached takeover laws, with a judge slamming the Queensland mining tycoon’s claims the charges were politically motivated and saying there was “nothing exceptional” to warrant interference from the court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
ASIC brings criminal case against Clive Palmer
Corporate 2018-04-07 8:42 pm By Christine Caulfield
Clive Palmer’s assets frozen by Queensland court
Article 2018-05-25 8:42 pm By Christine Caulfield
Second judge steps down ahead of Queensland Nickel trial
Energy & Natural Resources 2018-11-05 8:42 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au