A judge has grudgingly agreed to allow a law firm to run an investor’s case against S&P Global over ratings on toxic financial products separately from a class action that makes the same claims, but was warned of the “costs consequences” of the parallel proceedings.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Want to test drive Lawyerly? Contact us to take a free trial.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au