In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says

The judge overseeing the trial alleging fraud on the part of barristers and the funder behind a class action over Banksia Securities will be asked to award at least $32 million to the failed property lender’s 16,000 debenture holders for the serious misconduct alleged against the lawyers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
‘I didn’t put two and two together’: Lawyer says he never caught on to misconduct in Banksia case
Andrew Palmer 2020-12-09 11:02 pm By Christine Caulfield
Banksia funder Mark Elliott’s ‘practice’ of deleting emails doesn’t gel, court told
Andrew Palmer 2020-10-30 11:02 pm By Christine Caulfield
‘I idolised dad’: Banksia funder’s son takes stand over class action fee scandal
Andrew Palmer 2020-12-01 11:02 pm By Christine Caulfield
Banksia class action lawyer never asked to see barrister’s fee slips, admits ‘gross dereliction to clients’
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-14 11:02 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Top silk abandons defence, expresses ‘very deep regret’ over conduct in Banksia class action
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-03 11:02 pm By Miklos Bolza
Judge questions whether Banksia class action lawyers should be struck off roll
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-30 11:02 pm By Alison Eveleigh

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au