In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says
Please login to bookmarkClose

The son of Banksia class action funder Mark Elliott, who has been accused of complicity in a fraudulent scheme to maximise the profits of the lawyers in the case, was young and inexperienced and didn’t know his father’s conduct was wrong, his barrister has told a court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Banksia judge to hear case against lawyer Alex Elliott after appeals court nixes recusal bid
Angus Christophersen 2020-10-02 10:36 pm By Christine Caulfield
‘Not tenable’: Banksia judge tosses Alex Elliott’s request that he recuse himself
Angel Aleksov 2020-09-07 10:36 pm By Alison Eveleigh
Judge drags Mark Elliott’s son, costs consultant into Banksia class action fee scandal
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-19 10:36 pm By Christine Caulfield
Banksia funder’s son must give ‘full and frank’ explanation of alleged role in fee scandal
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-21 10:36 pm By Christine Caulfield
Top silk abandons defence, expresses ‘very deep regret’ over conduct in Banksia class action
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-08-03 10:36 pm By Miklos Bolza
Silk Norman O’Bryan likely to face further scrutiny after admissions in Banksia class action
Analysis 2020-08-06 10:36 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au