In The News
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says
ACCC delays decision on Coles acquisition of Saputo plants
Hungry Jack’s to take bite out of franchisee’s profits with ‘competing’ restaurants: suit
Please login to bookmark Close

The lawyers behind two class actions against clothing retailer Surfstitch breached their duties to act in the best interests of shareholders, and their conduct should bar them from pocketing more than $6 million claimed in costs and commission in the protracted litigation, a court has heard.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Surfstitch agrees to settle shareholder class actions, again
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2019-10-15 10:36 pm By Cat Fredenburgh
Surfstitch class action members may be better off bailing out of settlement
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-01-15 10:36 pm By Miklos Bolza
Surfstitch class action settlement amount slashed amid ‘very difficult retail environment’
Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-03-25 10:36 pm By Miklos Bolza
Surfstitch judge says court can’t drop opt-out notice to class
Class Actions 2018-11-16 10:36 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au