Judge questions whether Banksia class action lawyers should be struck off roll

Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-30 9:11 pm By Alison Eveleigh | Sydney

Please login to bookmark

The judge overseeing a trial over legal fees and funding commission in the Banksia Securities class action has questioned whether the lawyers behind the case should remain on the roll of practitioners if allegations of misconduct aired in the hearing so far — which include billing for phantom costs — are made out.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Mark Elliott was Banksia class action lawyer’s ‘puppet master’, court told

Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-29 9:11 pm By Alison Eveleigh

Banksia class action was ‘party like no other’ for Mark Elliott and barristers, court told

Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-07-28 9:11 pm By Alison Eveleigh

Banksia class action funder can’t keep details of misconduct claims under wraps

Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-06-03 9:11 pm By Christine Caulfield

‘Serious questions’ raised over conduct of lawyers, funder behind Banksia class action, judge says

Arnold Bloch Leibler 2019-09-26 9:11 pm By Christine Caulfield

Top silk ‘joked’ with class action lawyer Mark Elliott about misleading fee expert, court told

Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-05-05 9:11 pm By Christine Caulfield

Top barrister retained interest in Mark Elliott’s funding co. after wife sold shares, court told

Arnold Bloch Leibler 2020-06-09 9:11 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au