In The News
Test post after maintenance
Construction Test 7
Construction Test 6
Construction Test 5
Construction test article 2
Test – Racing Victoria planned agreement to ‘seriously breach’ competition laws, court hears
Construction test article 1
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds

Law firm Squire Patton Boggs is again on the losing end of a ruling by the judge presiding over a shareholder class action against GetSwift, a case now better known for infighting among lawyers than for the allegations levelled against the tech startup.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Want to test drive Lawyerly? Contact us to take a free trial.
Related articles
No holds barred in GetSwift class action challenge
Appeals 2018-07-27 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
GetSwift’s defence says Squire Patton Boggs partly liable
Article 2018-07-17 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
Squire Patton Boggs loses epic battle over GetSwift client communications
Class Actions 2018-06-25 10:19 pm By Miklos Bolza
Law firm can’t put ‘parasitic’ rival on hook for GetSwift costs
Article 2018-06-15 10:19 pm By Miklos Bolza
GetSwift judge won’t be slowed by class action appeal
Class Actions 2018-06-08 10:19 pm By Miklos Bolza
Corrs Chambers fights ruling that hit pause on GetSwift class action
Appeals 2018-06-07 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
Squire Patton Boggs appeals stay of GetSwift class action
Class Actions 2018-06-04 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
Judge picks Phi Finney to lead GetSwift shareholder class action
Class Actions 2018-05-23 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au