In The News
Test
Test
I’m afraid AI can’t do that: Law firms say smart tech uses limited
Holden dealers reject GM’s bleak alternate reality in class action
Lawyer’s defamation case fails serious harm test, judge finds
Nine, News Corp defeat defamation suits over Central Coast crime coverage
Zip offered Firstmac $4M to settle trade mark suit
High Court rejects Qantas appeal in ground crew sacking case
High Court to rule on reach of workplace law in high-stakes Qantas case
Mosaic Brands boss told GM paying $275K bonus would land him in jail, suit says

Three senior Federal Court judges will hear arguments Monday and Tuesday in a closely-watched appeal of a ruling that stayed two of three competing shareholder class actions against GetSwift as an abuse of process, and the impact of the Full Court’s ruling will be felt for a long time to come. Here are five major issues the court will be wrestling with over the next two days.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
GetSwift’s defence says Squire Patton Boggs partly liable
Article 2018-07-17 11:18 pm By Christine Caulfield
GetSwift judge won’t be slowed by class action appeal
Class Actions 2018-06-08 11:18 pm By Miklos Bolza
No holds barred in GetSwift class action challenge
Appeals 2018-07-27 11:18 pm By Christine Caulfield
Squire Patton Boggs must pay rival’s fees for fighting GetSwift restraint
Class Actions 2018-07-31 11:18 pm By Christine Caulfield
Law firm can’t put ‘parasitic’ rival on hook for GetSwift costs
Article 2018-06-15 11:18 pm By Miklos Bolza
Squire Patton Boggs appeals stay of GetSwift class action
Class Actions 2018-06-04 11:18 pm By Christine Caulfield
Corrs Chambers fights ruling that hit pause on GetSwift class action
Appeals 2018-06-07 11:18 pm By Christine Caulfield
5 things to watch in the GetSwift class action appeal
Analysis 2018-08-03 11:18 pm By Christine Caulfield

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au